Re: Extended attributes in the grammar (was: Re: [WebIDL] Java package mapping)

[Kartikaya Gupta]

On Wed, 3 Dec 2008 12:12:50 +1100, Cameron McCormack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> Since ExtendedAttributeIdentifier and friends will never appear in a
> derivation of Definitions, the main parsing of the IDL fragment won’t
> have ambiguities.  The second pass, where the extended attribute forms
> are determined will, but I expect it would be easier to do ad-hoc
> parsing here instead of using the productions directly.
> 

That works, thanks.

Cheers,
kats