Hi Frederick,

2009/2/12 Frederick Hirsch <[email protected]>:
>
> I have an additional suggested revision to the Widgets 1.0 Requirements, 
> dated 28 January [1]:
>
> (1) R44. Signature Document Format
> http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-reqs/#r44.-signature-document-format
>
> I suggest some changes to clarify to capture the intent that Mark noted [2].
>
> (1a) Replace "used independently" with "conveyed independently"

Done.

> (1b) Add after:
> "A conforming specification SHOULD provide guidelines for how any digital 
> signature can be used separately from a widget resource."
>
> the following
>
> "An example of such use is to perform certificate chain validation and other 
> checks related to the signature key information, without necessarily 
> validating the referenced widget content at that time. Risks associated with 
> separating time of verification and validation steps may need consideration."
>

Added.

Kind regards,
Marcos


-- 
Marcos Caceres
http://datadriven.com.au

Reply via email to