I updated section 4 to correspond to this:
"If the signatures list is not empty, sort the list of signatures by
the file name field in ascending numerical order (e.g.signature1.xml
followed by signature2.xml followed by signature3.xml etc)."
regards, Frederick
Frederick Hirsch
Nokia
On Mar 6, 2009, at 10:07 AM, ext Marcos Caceres wrote:
Hi Frederick,
On 3/6/09 3:59 PM, Frederick Hirsch wrote:
I've updated the widget signature document distributor file naming
convention to the following after discussing this with Josh (thanks
Josh):
Naming convention for a distributor signature:
|"signature" [1-9][0-9]* ".xml"|
*
Each distributor signature /MUST/ have a name consisting of
the string "signature" followed by a digit in the range 1-9
inclusive, followed by zero or more digits in the range 0-9
inclusive and then ".xml", as stated by the BNF. An
example is
"signature20.xml".
*
Leading zeros are disallowed in the numbers.
*
Any file name that does not match this BNF /MUST/ be
ignored.
Thus a file named "signature01.xml" will be ignored. A
warning
/MAY/ be generated.
*
There is no requirement that all the signature file names
form
a contiguous set of numeric values.
*
These signatures /MUST/ be sorted numerically based on the
numeric portion of the name. Thus signature2.xml preceeds
signature11.xml, for example.
See draft
http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-digsig/#distributor-signatures
I also updated the notation section, changed the code format to be
italic (without color), and updated the body style to not be quite
so large.
Please indicate any comment or corrections on the list.
The changes look good to me! thank you.
Kind regards,
Marcos
