No I agree, we are trying to stay away from legal statements , that
requires much more.
regards, Frederick
Frederick Hirsch
Nokia
On Mar 27, 2009, at 10:40 AM, ext Marcin Hanclik wrote:
Hi Frederick,
re author, would the term "creator" in the sentence from Thomas
help,
this probably doesn't help, since by definition author means
creator...
Yes, it seems the same.
Thomas' statement:
" What the author certificate lets you verify is whether a single
party is taking responsibility for two widgets.
There is indeed no *proof* of authorship here, but a statement that
the signer is willing to assume the blame for being the widget's
author. Which is all we need, no?"
As for me author is just some distinguished entity. That's all and
nothing more.
I think we should not try to specify in the W3C spec that the author
takes the responsibility for what the widget does. It could be
legally binding. Is this what we really want?
Thanks.
Kind regards,
Marcin
Marcin Hanclik
ACCESS Systems Europe GmbH
Tel: +49-208-8290-6452 | Fax: +49-208-8290-6465
Mobile: +49-163-8290-646
E-Mail: [email protected]
________________________________________
Access Systems Germany GmbH
Essener Strasse 5 | D-46047 Oberhausen
HRB 13548 Amtsgericht Duisburg
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Michel Piquemal, Tomonori Watanabe, Yusuke Kanda
www.access-company.com
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
This e-mail and any attachments hereto may contain information that
is privileged or confidential, and is intended for use only by the
individual or entity to which it is addressed. Any disclosure,
copying or distribution of the information by anyone else is
strictly prohibited.
If you have received this document in error, please notify us
promptly by responding to this e-mail. Thank you.
