On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Marcos Caceres wrote: > > If you think it is possible to have read only Storage values, naturally > we would need some kind of access violation exception to be thrown when > someone tries to change a read only value...
Sure. For each Storage object that isn't sessionStorage or localStorage, you'll need a section like "3.4 The localStorage attribute", but defining the contents of the object for your case. There, you can add additional restrictions like "if setItem() is invoked with a value defined as read-only, then the user agent must throw a NO_MODIFICATION_ALLOWED_ERR exception" or whatever. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
