On Apr 13, 2009, at 6:35 PM, ext Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:18:42 +0200, Arthur Barstow
<[email protected]>
wrote:
What are the next steps for moving CORS along the Rec track?
There were two related "Raised" issues and earlier today I moved
them to
Open:
http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/products/7
Please feel free to respond on public-webapps.
I commented on both those issues when they were raised (see "Related
Notes"). I don't think either of them is valid at this point.
OK, that's what I thought.
All - Anne believes these two issues [I-27] and [I-28] are addressed
in the latest CORS ED [CORS] and thus should be closed. If you
disagree with closing these two issues (short rationale is included
in the "Related Notes" section of each issue's Changelog), please
reply by April 24.
As per my latest status report redirects is still an issue and
Jonas told
me he'd e-mail something about that but he hasn't done that yet. I
don't
know of any other outstanding issue. (Arguably the Origin header is an
outstanding issue but I don't really see how we can rename it or
change it
at this point.)
(For redirects I think we should make a 303 response on a preflight
request a network error and leave the draft unchanged for
everything else.)
Jonas - please let us know your thoughts on the redirect issue.
Anne - other than the redirects issue, are there any other open
issues/actions that must be addressed before a LCWD is published?
-Regards, Art Barstow
[I-27] <http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/issues/27>
[I-28] <http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/issues/28>
[CORS] <http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/access-control/>
