I agree that the sentence should be dropped.
I'll take an editorial pass today to remove that sentence, address the
agreed changes on Mark's editorial comments and to remove the Created
material.
Thanks for noting this one.
regards, Frederick
Frederick Hirsch
Nokia
On Apr 22, 2009, at 11:26 AM, ext Marcos Caceres wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 3:31 PM, Frederick Hirsch
<[email protected]> wrote:
d. What needs to be done before this spec is "feature-complete" and
ready for Last Call WD publication?
address editorial comments from Mark, as posted on list
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009AprJun/0256.html
can edit this today.
Agree to coordination published update of Signature Properties,
thus remove
section 9 from widget signature
http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-digsig/#sigproperties
any other comments received that we might have missed?
I'm not sure if we addressed the issue that was raised on a two blogs
about the assertion that "Widget authors and distributors can
digitally sign widgets as a trust and quality assurance mechanism."
It was suggested that we should drop that sentence, I think.
--
Marcos Caceres
http://datadriven.com.au
