On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Robin Berjon <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > I'd like us to agree to a plan to get WAR to FPWD as soon as possible. I > would suggest the following that we build on the document that Marcos has > already put up[0], add an extended version of the SM processing that Thomas > discussed on this list[1], and note the points on which there is > disagreement. With that, go to FPWD. > > Then I would like the plan to be that we call for discussion here on the > disagreement, and try to resolve them.
Sure. I can do a call today. > Thoughts? Removing this has had messy ripple effects — it would be nice to > address the issue quickly. It would be great to have those affected on the call if possible. Theoretically, we can get a spec out by Friday if the W3C can help us out. However, there is a whole bunch of admin stuff that needs to happen before we can get a FPWD to happen. -- Marcos Caceres http://datadriven.com.au
