On 6/2/09 11:48 AM, Marcin Hanclik wrote:
Hi Marcos,

Thanks for the link!
It is very helpful.
It seems, however, that the versioning battle is still there.
The blog you directed me to is still just a blog AFAIK.

Yes, but the blog post is written by an authority on the subject. See also the posts by David Orchard, who is also a highly respected authority on the matter. There are whole conferences on the subject too, if you need academic sources that support the rationale for not using versioning.

So http://www.w3.org/TR/webarch/ may need an update as in the blog, presumably 
preceded by some discussion.

As a kind of summary, it is ok for me to have namespace as versioning mechanism.

Right. But not in the manner you were suggesting. Only use namespace versioning as a last resort (i.e., the language is soooo "fubar", in the classical sense, that a new namespace is needed ).

Having namespace + version + baseProfile seems redundant.

right.

Thanks.

Kind regards,
Marcin

Marcin Hanclik
ACCESS Systems Germany GmbH
Tel: +49-208-8290-6452  |  Fax: +49-208-8290-6465
Mobile: +49-163-8290-646
E-Mail: [email protected]

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
Marcos Caceres
Sent: Monday, June 01, 2009 12:18 PM
To: Marcin Hanclik; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [widgets] P&C Last Call comments, versioning

On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Cameron McCormack<[email protected]>  wrote:
Marcin Hanclik:
I have reviewed a few recommendations from http://www.w3.org/TR/.
a) SVGT1.2 http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-SVGTiny12-20081222/ says:
"Future versions of this specification will maintain backwards
compatibility with previous versions of the language" SVGT1.2 uses
version attribute to describe the version of the standard that
was used to write the SVG document. They also use "baseProfile"
as a further means for content versioning/requirements in
http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-SVGTiny12-20081222/single-page.html#implnote-VersionControl.
Just to be clear, version="" and baseProfile="" in SVG Tiny 1.2 are used
only as a hint from the content author as to what minimum version of the
language is required for the content to work properly.  No difference
in processing is required for differently specified version="" and
baseProfile="" attributes.


See also the link below for a detailed discussion as to why you are
suggesting in not ideal:
http://www.w3.org/QA/2007/12/version_identifiers_reconsider.html

--
Marcos Caceres
http://datadriven.com.au

________________________________________

Access Systems Germany GmbH
Essener Strasse 5  |  D-46047 Oberhausen
HRB 13548 Amtsgericht Duisburg
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Michel Piquemal, Tomonori Watanabe, Yusuke Kanda

www.access-company.com

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
This e-mail and any attachments hereto may contain information that is 
privileged or confidential, and is intended for use only by the
individual or entity to which it is addressed. Any disclosure, copying or 
distribution of the information by anyone else is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this document in error, please notify us promptly by 
responding to this e-mail. Thank you.

Reply via email to