On Fri, 24 Apr 2009, Robin Berjon wrote: > On Apr 24, 2009, at 11:12 , Marcos Caceres wrote: > > > Also note that a scheme doesn't necessarily uniquely map to a protocol, so > > > it should probably say "scheme handler". > > > > Right. I thought the same thing. I used "protocol handler" to be > > consistent with HTML5. > > Ah, well before we use different terminology we should have a chat with > someone who knows where that wording comes from in HTML5 and see if > there's a reason to keep it.
I've corrected HTML5's terminology. (The word "protocol" is still used in the API, for consistency with other parts of the Web API, e.g. the location.protocol attribute.) -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
