>>Ok, that makes sense; but I have serious doubts anyone will implement that. Why? You mean because it would not sell, because it is bad by design or any other reason?
Marcin Hanclik ACCESS Systems Germany GmbH Tel: +49-208-8290-6452 | Fax: +49-208-8290-6465 Mobile: +49-163-8290-646 E-Mail: [email protected] -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Marcos Caceres Sent: Monday, June 08, 2009 8:34 PM To: Marcin Hanclik Cc: Scott Wilson; Henri Sivonen; public-webapps Subject: Re: [widgets] What does it mean to have an unavailable API 2009/6/3 Marcin Hanclik <[email protected]>: > Hi Scott, > >>>I can see the UC for requestFeature, though its not something we'd >>>ever expect to use - we'd stick to just static feature declarations, >>>as we have no way of injecting scripts into instances after they've >>>already launched. > There is an ongoing debate about requestFeature(). > BONDI spec is approaching both widgets and websites and basically > requestFeature() is planned to be primarily used only by websites. > Ok, that makes sense; but I have serious doubts anyone will implement that. -- Marcos Caceres http://datadriven.com.au ________________________________________ Access Systems Germany GmbH Essener Strasse 5 | D-46047 Oberhausen HRB 13548 Amtsgericht Duisburg Geschaeftsfuehrer: Michel Piquemal, Tomonori Watanabe, Yusuke Kanda www.access-company.com CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This e-mail and any attachments hereto may contain information that is privileged or confidential, and is intended for use only by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. Any disclosure, copying or distribution of the information by anyone else is strictly prohibited. If you have received this document in error, please notify us promptly by responding to this e-mail. Thank you.
