Somehow this arrived late in my inbox :/ On Tue, 09 Jun 2009 18:29:25 +0200, Tyler Close <[email protected]> wrote: > I think there are two main reasons: > > 1. ADsafe, Caja and others provide finer grained control over what the > widget can do.
Could you elaborate on that? > 2. All ads/widgets are fetched by the same HTTP request that fetches > the containing page. The overhead of a separate iframe per ad/widget > was too much for the expected use-cases. This hasn't been done yet but the idea is to add a document="" (or some such) attribute to <iframe> that takes a string of markup to be rendered in a sandboxed way which should take away this concern. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
