On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Marcin Hanclik<[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Marcos, > > Great thanks for all the fixes! > I have seen also the further changes in the draft. > > One more comment to this chunk: > > "Authors need to keep path lengths below 250 bytes. Unicode code points can > require more than one byte to encode a character, which can result in a path > whose length is less than 250 characters." > > The second sentence is actually not needed in this form. > I would drop it or change it as follows: > > "Authors need to keep path lengths below 250 bytes. Unicode code points may > require more than one byte to encode a character, which can result in a path > whose length is less than 250 characters to be represented in more than 250 > bytes." >
Right, I used this instead: "Authoring guideline: Authors need to keep path lengths below 250 bytes. Unicode code points may require more than one byte to encode a character, which can result in a path whose length is less than 250 characters but whose size is greater than 250 bytes." -- Marcos Caceres http://datadriven.com.au
