Robin Berjon wrote:
On Jun 19, 2009, at 10:16 , Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Fri, 19 Jun 2009 01:01:41 +0200, Arun Ranganathan <a...@mozilla.com> wrote:
Ian Hickson wrote:
I spoke with the developers of one of these Well-Known Web
Applications, and they didn't even _mention_ the styling difficulties
of <input type=file> as one of the reasons for using Flash here.

This feedback is extremely useful.  I, too, would like the chance to
speak with the developers of (that particular application) as well as
with other developers.

Maciej said that the MobileMe developers gave pretty much the same feedback:

 http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/whatwg/20090619#l-90

Is it really that bad to wait with evaluating this feature until v1 is more widely deployed?

Given that we're still in WD, how about simply adding a note indicating that this feature is under scrutiny (with pointers to this discussion)? If it is still under scrutiny when we move to LC we can make a call to keep it alive, and if it makes it through LC we can still mark it as "at risk"

That seems sensible. Also, FWIW, in email exchanged on this listserv, Hixie and I refer to "... well known web apps..." which seems at best overly cautious. It might be well worth enumerating the *actual web apps* that we are using for some due diligence and use case structuring.

To date, we have heard from GMail, MobileMe, and WordPress (via the Mozilla 2009 All Hands). I'd like to follow up a bit more with applications like Flickr, follow-up some discussions with WordPress, etc. Of course, it isn't possible to exhaustively talk to ALL web app developers, but it seems good to have some discussion on this subject. I'd encourage those who are able to post feedback *as developers of such applications* to do so as well.

I'm not trying to be difficult; the objections to FileDialog have been really useful. It's good to be thorough :-)

-- A*





Reply via email to