On Jun 16, 2009, at 15:42, Marcos Caceres wrote:
Based on Arve and Robin's additional feedback, I've added the
following to the spec as part of "The Feature Element" section:
"How a user agent makes use of features depends on the user agent's
security policy, hence activation and authorization requirements for
features are beyond the scope of this specification."
Is that satisfactory?
I think it's better than what was in the spec before. However, if a
reader doesn't already know what <feature> is for, I think the current
text might not make it quite clear.
I notice that now the definition of what a feature is includes a video
codec in addition to APIs. Does BONDI expect video codecs to be
sensitive to security policies? Do you envision undeclared video
codecs to be withheld from the HTML5 <source> fallback and
canPlayType()?
--
Henri Sivonen
[email protected]
http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
