On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 5:24 PM, Anne van Kesteren<ann...@opera.com> wrote: > On Wed, 10 Jun 2009 17:20:25 +0200, Marcos Caceres <marc...@opera.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 4:57 PM, Anne van Kesteren<ann...@opera.com> >> wrote: >>> "TO BE WRITTEN, PLEASE IGNORE" if normative material is yet to be >>> written you cannot enter Last Call. Per >>> http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#return-to-wg it >>> seems you have to publish this as Working Draft again. >> >> You are reviewing the (bleeding-edge) editor's draft, Anne. Not the >> published one. That is obviously not in the published draft [1], it's >> just something I put in there yesterday during the F2F and have not >> had a chance to finish yet... I will finish that bit tomorrow. >> Obviously, that won't be in the final draft. >> >> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/widgets/ > > Oh ok. All the more reason the cited process document applies though, > methinks.
Understood and I see what you mean. I will continue editing and then let the chairs and team contacts decide if we need to republish or if we can proceed to CR. Is that OK? Kind regards, Marcos -- Marcos Caceres http://datadriven.com.au
