On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 4:22 PM, Garrett Smith<dhtmlkitc...@gmail.com> wrote: >> With that in mind, do you still think it makes sense to have progress >> events and all the other events you are proposing? > > I've reread my message. The arguments and reasoning given for Events > seem clear and concise. The argument for Progress Events was > illustrated with an example and a comparison. What was confusing?
What is the use case for the API you are proposing? I agree that what you are proposing allows for a lot of flexibility, but it also results in an API that is more complex. Thus I think we should stick with the current API unless you have use cases in mind that only works in the API you are proposing. / Jonas
