If the extended attribute should not be ECMAScript, the description at http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebIDL/#Callback must also be revised due to the strong ES-reference.
What about [ValueTypeInterface]? Regards, Steffen -----Original Message----- From: Maciej Stachowiak [mailto:m...@apple.com] Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2009 9:15 AM To: Marcin Hanclik Cc: Cameron McCormack; Giovanni Campagna; Kruessel, Steffen; WebApps WG; i...@hixie.ch Subject: Re: [WebIDL] Callback, PropertyOnly, NoInterfaceObject On Jun 30, 2009, at 11:29 PM, Marcin Hanclik wrote: > What about [ESNativeObject]? I don't think the property should be ES-specific. It would probably have effects for other language bindings too. I'm also not sure this clarifies the use of Native. Regards, Maciej
