2009/6/10 Anne van Kesteren <[email protected]>:
> I don't really like the optional ITS behavior. Also, what is the effect of 
> having it there?

My understanding is that, in implementations, the appropriate unicode
directionality markers would be inserted where the its elements and
attributes appear.

> If this is a feature needed by authors it also seems better for them if they 
> have it without all the additional namespaces.
>

This is here because I18N community requested it, we added it, it's
optional and has been marked as a "feature-at-risk" (as described and
allowed in the process document). If no one implements it, then we
will remove it.

> textContent is an attribute, not a property. In bindings it might turn into a 
> property, but that is not relevant I think.
>

Fixed.

-- 
Marcos Caceres
http://datadriven.com.au

Reply via email to