Dear Robin,
Thanks for your email.
Robin Berjon a écrit :
There would then be a good case for the WG to spend some time on
devising a proper workaround.
Anyone sharing my opinion that the widget update feature will be
consistenly implemented (even if optional) ?
You seem to be mixing up Widget Updates and the update() method, is
that the case?
JCD: I understood the widget.update() method being discussed to be the
scripted version of the Widget Updates mechanism.
Please tell me if I am wrong. The current draft seems to still say that.
And I am really not sure that a script-triggered version of the update
mechanism can be discarded off-hand.
Best regards
JC
PS: test sequences may be informative, but their content defines what is
tested for normative behavior, so if a feature is tested in a sequence,
it will appear normative to lawyers, even if the text of the spec says
otherwise.
--
JC Dufourd
Groupe Multimedia/Multimedia Group
Traitement du Signal et Images/Signal and Image Processing
Télécom ParisTech, 46 rue Barrault, 75 013 Paris, France
