On Tue, 30 Jun 2009 09:07:22 +0200, Cameron McCormack <c...@mcc.id.au>
wrote:
Cameron McCormack:
Following are my half baked proposals.
I’ve now baked all of these proposals into the spec, except for the one
about allowing multiple module levels with a module declaration (i.e.,
‘module a::b::c’).
* Made ‘in’ optional
http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebIDL/#idl-operations
Having it optional will likely lead to inconsistently written IDLs, which
can be confusing. I think it would be better to either require it (as
legacy cruft, basically) or remove it altogether (the relevant IDLs will
need to be rewritten anyway for the other changes).
--
Simon Pieters
Opera Software
