I agree with Marcos that public-webapps should not be used for overly
detailed implementation discussions. However, it is often the case
that implementation discussion is welcome if not necessary e.g. for
the WG to make rational decisions.
Of course it is a judgement call as to when a discussion is "too"
detailed. In this particular case, I do not think the line has been
crossed.
-Regards, Art Barstow
On Jul 27, 2009, at 1:22 PM, ext ~:'' ありがとうございまし
た wrote:
Marcos,
I am quite well aware of the purported purposes of w3 lists, with
somewhat over a decade's experience.
however there are rather serious security and privacy concerns, and if
the current UA implementations have not followed the specifications**,
and these need to be fed back to the editors and authors to ensure
updates and errata incorporate this possible failure.
regards
~:"
** as mentioned in the original email:
User agents should present the persistent storage feature to the user
in a way that does not distinguish them from HTTP session cookies.
On 27 Jul 2009, at 18:09, Marcos Caceres wrote:
Hi,
This mailing list is for discussion of the spec, not implementations.
Please find another list to have this discussion.
Thanks!
Marcos
2009/7/27 "~:'' ありがとうございました"
<[email protected]>:
http://dev.w3.org/html5/webstorage/#user-tracking
Treating persistent storage as cookies: mozilla & safari
anyone been able to clear localStorage via cookie preferences in
mozilla or
safari?
regards
Jonathan Chetwynd
testcase:
https://bug506639.bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=390836
however not found the relevant cookie in Safari, and minefield
appears
currently not to have a cookie manager
~:"
