On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 2:31 PM, Marcin Hanclik<[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Marcos, > > Thanks for your comments. > >>>Which developers in particular did you have in mind? > I meant developers who could develop widgets "by hand", without any > automation. > (These may the same people as here: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-device-apis/2009Apr/0013.html) > >>>How do you >>>propose we conduct this survey? > I do not know. > I thought that some developers read this mail thread and could simply respond > if they care. > If not, then maybe it is early enough to simply specify normalization, > mandatory usage of UTF-8 or anything else clarifying the P&C spec? > >>>Maybe we can ask BONDI to conduct a >>>survey as part of their upcoming Widget coding thing? > Good idea. > >>>Sure. Please feel free to start this discussion with them. > I will draft an email. > >>>I'm ok to add this. So, in Step 7, for a given attribute (x): >>> >>>1. if the value of attribute x is not UTF-8, let value-x be the value >>>of attribute x encoded as UTF 8. >>>2. normalize value-x by applying section 5 of RFC3987. > > OK. > Ad 1. US-ASCII is UTF-8, so for me 2. = 1. > > >>>WRT 2 above, that is not clear enough for me. I will need help to >>>specify that properly. > I think 2. can be left as is, 1. could be removed. > I will put this into the email to i18n and I will help you in specifying this > fragment.
Ok, thank you. The sooner the better so we can know if we need to list this as an official ISSUE in the spec. -- Marcos Caceres http://datadriven.com.au
