On Sep 4, 2009, at 7:47 PM, Michael Nordman wrote:

Try this link instead...
http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebSimpleDatabase/

Nikunj's link actually points to http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/DataCache/ which is also interesting, but seemingly not what was intended.

Sorry about this problem. Got tripped by the mail editor there.


@Nikunj, I have not yet read thru your draft in detail, but will do so.

Look forward to the feedback.

In principle, I agree with the notion of a standard that does not depend on a particular sql dialect (or an assumed sql dialect) to reap the rewards of structured storage, query, and retrieval.

The intention is to enable a far richer ecosystem of independent implementations. Plus to take advantage of the ECMAScript environment and avoid marshalling between result sets and JavaScript objects.

As I said, I haven't read it thru yet... have you addressed full text indexing and search in some form? And if not, that would be a feature request.

I am aware of full-text. If someone is willing to contribute resources, I would be glad to work in this feature.



On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 1:45 PM, Nikunj R. Mehta <[email protected] > wrote: I have published the first draft of the WebSimpleDatabase API, which is based on B-tree databases [1]. Here's a link to the draft:

http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebSimpleDatabase/

Abstract:
This document defines APIs for storing and retreving ordered key-value pairs in a transactional database.

I would request feedback that we can incorporate before publication as a working draft. Please note that certain items are purposely under-specified at the moment. I want to gauge the potential interest in this direction and evolve it to meet the needs of the WG.

Nikunj
http://o-micron.blogspot.com

[1] http://www.w3.org/mid/[email protected]


Nikunj
http://o-micron.blogspot.com



Reply via email to