Hi, I think we should not mix Resource Identifiers with schemes and scheme names (aka semantics and syntax). As for me WRI and XRI are schemes that follow URI/IRI syntax and define new scheme names and add semantics/interpretation.
I hope that the terms "scheme", "scheme-name" will be fixed in the upcoming IRI spec [1] (thus I CCed public-iri). Thanks, Marcin [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-iri/2009Jul/0029.html Marcin Hanclik ACCESS Systems Germany GmbH Tel: +49-208-8290-6452 | Fax: +49-208-8290-6465 Mobile: +49-163-8290-646 E-Mail: [email protected] From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected] Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2009 1:17 PM To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: [widget-uri] Widget URI ABNF definition comments On 15.9.2009 13.55, "ext timeless" <[email protected]> wrote: On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 1:49 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Maybe changing the document name to "Widgets 1.0: Widget Resource > Identifiers" would sidestep some of the problem. :-) So we can have URNs, URLs, URIs, IRIs, and WRIs? i'm not sure that's an improvement :) Well, maybe not. But you forgot XRI by OASIS [1]. :-) --Jere [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extensible_Resource_Identifier ________________________________ ________________________________________ Access Systems Germany GmbH Essener Strasse 5 | D-46047 Oberhausen HRB 13548 Amtsgericht Duisburg Geschaeftsfuehrer: Michel Piquemal, Tomonori Watanabe, Yusuke Kanda www.access-company.com CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This e-mail and any attachments hereto may contain information that is privileged or confidential, and is intended for use only by the individual or entity to which it is addressed. Any disclosure, copying or distribution of the information by anyone else is strictly prohibited. If you have received this document in error, please notify us promptly by responding to this e-mail. Thank you.
