This sounds like a good idea. One thing we can do to reduce the complexity is to have different grammars for server conformance and for user agent conformance. Essentially, servers would be required to conform to the current grammar, but UAs would be required to conform to the more tolerant grammar.
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 4:27 PM, =JeffH <[email protected]> wrote: > invalid-STSDirective = <name> | <name> ":" | <name> ":" <value> > <name> = anything but ":" or ";" > <value> = anything but ";" I'm not sure what role ":" is playing here. It might be easier to just omit it from the grammar. Adam
