On Sep 29, 2009, at 5:27 PM, Jeremy Orlow wrote:
There already is a "WebDatabase" API which is SQL based. That
sounds way to close to "WebDB" for my comfort.
Maybe WebDatabase should be WebSQLDatabase or WebSQLDB
I have suggested this before [1], but fighting about names seems to be
a lost cause in this WG.
And WebSimpleDB should be WebTreeDatabase or WebTreeDB?
An ordinary developer would not notice anything tree-like in this spec
and so it will not help anyone to call this TreeDB.
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 5:09 PM, Simon Raboczi <[email protected]>
wrote:
Please don't call your web database API "simple". It's a
meaningless noise word unless there's some other non-simple web
database API to compare it to. It doesn't even serve to produce a
pronounceable acronym like SAX or SOAP. "WebDB API" would be fine.
Nikunj
http://o-micron.blogspot.com
[1] http://www.w3.org/mid/[email protected]
