On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 12:37 PM, Arthur Barstow <[email protected]> wrote: > On Oct 6, 2009, at 6:34 AM, ext Marcos Caceres wrote: > >> On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Arthur Barstow <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> Marcsos, All, - given the next publication of the widgets P&C spec will >>> be a >>> LCWD, should the feature at risk stuff (its:dir) be deleted? >>> >> >> I don't know :( I think we should remove the at risk, and just run >> with it. It's still going to be optional, but at least it provides a >> solution for those that need it. >> >> The other way forward is that we remove ITS, make a new spec that >> defines our own @dir and <span> elements in the widget namespace. I've >> put that idea to the group before and didn't get a very positive >> response. My only personal gripe with ITS is that it requires another >> namespace. That's a pain for both developers and implementers. But, I >> can live with it. > > Do we have any evidence at all that it (as defined in the 23-July-2009 > Candidate) either has been implemented or is being implemented?
No, we do not have any evidence or commitment of implementation of this feature. -- Marcos Caceres http://datadriven.com.au
