On Oct 7, 2009, at 9:25 AM, ext Marcos Caceres wrote:
(Apologies up front, the following is going to to seem like a rather
dumb and slightly condescending discussion. I honestly do not mean it
to be, but its necessary to help me identify where I need to fix the
specification. Please bear with me.)
LOL!
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 2:24 PM, Arthur Barstow
<[email protected]> wrote:
Since the schema and Authoring guidelines are both non-normative,
the P+C
spec is not clear if an element's attributes are required or not.
When you say "required" (passive voice), do you mean:
My expectation is the spec will normatively state whether an
element's attributes (e.g. <widget> element has id, version, etc.)
are required or not in a configuration document.
I think this information is clear in the 23-July-2009 CR but it is
not clear in the TSE where the required information is embedded in
non-normative Authoring Guidelines.
-Regards, Art Barstow
