On Thu, 08 Oct 2009 18:53:32 +0200, Julian Reschke <[email protected]>
wrote:
Jonas Sicking wrote:
...
I think we'd really like to avoid creating a new scheme if we could
reuse an existing one. I know Arun was looking for an existing scheme,
but not sure if he looked at the 'urn' scheme.
Would it need to be urn:somename:uuid though? like urn:fileid:uuid?
...
What's wrong with urn:uuid, which is defined in RFC 4122 and already
cited?
You need to know what the URL is for in other contexts. It seems nicer if
that is explicit from the scheme rather than some additional bit of data
that is attached to the uuid.
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
