On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:41:32 +0100, Jonas Sicking <[email protected]> wrote:
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 9:29 AM, Anne van Kesteren <[email protected]>
wrote:
abort() has some legacy attached to it that I rather not copy.
Such as?
Actually, apart from switching the state to 0 in the end there is nothing.
(This does not happen for user aborts though so I still rather not copy
that.)
Anyway, do you have opinions on the synchronous case? Do you agree we
should use TIMEOUT_ERR there? What do the people from Microsoft think?
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
