On Nov 24, 2009, at 7:40 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, Arthur Barstow wrote:
Based on the responses for this call for comments, I see the next
steps as:
1. Server-sent Events, Web Storage and Web Workers - ready for LCWD
publication. Later today I will begin a CfC to publish LCWD of these
three specs
2. Web Sockets API - the group should discuss Adrian's comments:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009OctDec/0842.html
3. Web Database - there is sufficient interest to keep this spec on
the
Recommendation track. However, there is an open question about who
will
commit to drive this spec, in particular who will commit to being its
Editor. Hixie - would you please explain your intent/position here?
My intent with the Web SQL Database spec (or whatever I end up calling
it) is to continue to drive it to REC, but without defining the SQL
dialect in any more detail than the draft does now (as edited after
the
F2F).
This suggests that we are unlikely to make any progress on the draft
past this point.
I would not consider multiple implementations all using the same SQL
backend to be fully independent for the purposes of getting two
interoperable implementations for the purpose of exiting CR, and
thus I do
not expect this spec to ever get past that stage.
I don't see any logic in this that would benefit this WG.
<snip>
Nikunj
http://o-micron.blogspot.com
