On Dec 1, 2009, at 4:22 PM, ext Marcin Hanclik wrote:

Since the PAG has started with the earlier draft of WARP and relation to PAG was an argument for LC#2, we assume that the group still has time to accommodate the LC#1 comments in the present version of the specification without the detrimental effect on the proceedings within PAG.


On Dec 1, 2009, at 5:21 PM, ext Marcos Caceres wrote:

The PAG had no bearing on this work. Work continues as
normal.

On Dec 2, 2009, at 4:38 AM, ext Marcin Hanclik wrote:

I understood the email from Art [1] that there is a timing relation between both.

The decision to publish LC#2 of the WARP spec is independent of the WARP PAG.

A side effect of publishing LC#2 is a dated and immutable version of the spec will be created and the PAG *could* use that dated version *if* it so chooses. The PAG may also decide to use the latest ED but that has the disadvantage that it can change at any point of time.

-Art Barstow



Reply via email to