Hi,
Le 15/12/2009 18:00, Marcos Caceres a écrit :
Hi Cyril
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 4:41 PM, Cyril Concolato
<[email protected]> wrote:
Hi all,
In the test suite, the test br.wgt leads to a widget with no valid start
file. I think this should be considered an invalid widget because a Widget
UA will not be able to display it, the user may see an icon but nothing
happening when activating it. WDYT ?
Looking at the test description from the test suite:
"br.wgt (source files)
Tests the UA's ability to ignore subsequent repetitions of the content
element. To pass, the widget start file must treated by the user agent
as an invalid widget. "
My mistake, I must have misread with one of the above or below example... BTW,
maybe you can improve the sentence:
"Tests the UA's ability to ignore subsequent repetitions of the content element. To
pass, the widget must *be* treated by the user agent as an invalid widget."
remove 'start file' and add 'be'
Cyril
So yes, it is required to be treated as invalid?
I checked the config.xml and it seem to be ok? :
<widget xmlns="http://www.w3.org/ns/widgets";>
<name>br</name>
<content/>
<content src="fail.html"/>
</widget>
--
Cyril Concolato
Maître de Conférences/Associate Professor
Groupe Mutimedia/Multimedia Group
Telecom ParisTech
46 rue Barrault
75 013 Paris, France
http://concolato.blog.telecom-paristech.fr/
