On Thu, 26 Nov 2009 18:25:57 +0100, Richard Ishida <[email protected]> wrote:
Hopefully you'll get a formal response from the i18n WG shortly. In the
meantime, I have only a couple of personal editorial suggestions:
I have not seen a response from the i18n WG.
[1] 2.2 terminology
It would help a lot to link each of the terms defined in html5 to the
appropriate location in the html5 spec, if possible.
We have this situation in several specifications at the moment. I'm not
sure what the correct solution will be here so I rather wait with
implementing something until we agree on something that will work
everywhere. I agree it is not ideal, but having to update all the
terminology links all the time is not great either.
[2] same section
I was confused by the term "document's character encoding". I suspect
this ought to be "character encoding (of the document)", where the
parenthesised text is non-bold. The problem was that I thought
"document's character encoding" was a single term, like "URL character
encoding", and was something different than "character encoding" (in the
same way that "document character set" is different from "character
set").
It is actually a single term, defined by HTML5.
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
