On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, Arthur Barstow wrote: > On Dec 16, 2009, at 4:09 PM, ext Charles McCathieNevile wrote: > > On Wed, 16 Dec 2009 20:46:03 +0100, Ian Hickson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > What's the deadline by which we have to have submitted a request? If > > > there's time, I'd like to address Adrian's feedback on the Web > > > Sockets API and then either publish it as LC (if Adrian agrees) or > > > at least WD. > > > > I think it makes more sense to publish as a working draft right now. > > The reality is that wider review that wasn't actually done earlier is > > often triggered by people holding something up, so assuming that your > > approach to addressing those comments in one day would result in a > > draft the entire group thinks is ready if they actually review it > > carefully seems optimistic at best. > > Chaals' points are good and if we want a publication of websockets > before the December 18 publication request deadline, we should ask Hixie > to please prepare a (non-LC) WD of websockets for 22 December > publication. > > Hixie - is this doable?
Sounds good. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
