Le 05/01/2010 23:54, Marcos Caceres a écrit :
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 10:13 AM, Cyril Concolato
<[email protected]> wrote:
Hi,
The test df.wgt contains a feature without name. In this case, the feature
element is ignored and the widget remains valid.
The test d4.wgt contains an invalid feature name. In this case, the widget
should be considered as invalid. I don't understand that. I understand the
rationale that if a feature is required, the UA shall not process the
widget. Whether it does or not understand the feature, it doesn't matter. Is
it because you foresee evolution in the syntax of feature names, which
wouldn't be IRI ? If not, I suggest to make this test pass and ignore the
feature element.
Sorry, but it was a resolution that all correctly named features are
considered required (it's why we had to create the required
attribute). I'm against changing this.
It's not because "all correctly named features are considered required" (on which I
agree) that "invalid feature names must lead to invalid widgets" (on which I disagree). I
think invalid feature names should be ignored.
Cyril
--
Cyril Concolato
Maître de Conférences/Associate Professor
Groupe Mutimedia/Multimedia Group
Telecom ParisTech
46 rue Barrault
75 013 Paris, France
http://concolato.blog.telecom-paristech.fr/
