I support this publication.

On Jan 12, 2010, at 3:29 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote:

This is a Call for Consensus (CfC) to publish the First Public Working Draft (FPWD) of the Uniform Messaging Policy (UMP) spec, latest Editor's Draft at:

http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/UMP/

This CfC satisfies the group's requirement to "record the group's decision to request advancement".

By publishing this FPWD, the group sends a signal to the community to begin reviewing the document. The FPWD reflects where the group is on this spec at the time of publication; it does not necessarily mean there is consensus on the spec's contents.

As with all of our CfCs, positive response is preferred and encouraged and silence will be assumed to be assent.

The deadline for comments is January 19.

-Art Barstow

Begin forwarded message:

From: ext Tyler Close <tyler.cl...@gmail.com>
Date: January 7, 2010 8:21:10 PM EST
To: public-webapps <public-webapps@w3.org>
Subject: [UMP] A declarative version of "Uniform Messaging Policy"
Archived-At: <http://www.w3.org/mid/5691356f1001071721k3ca16400qe5a2f4d6d966c...@mail.gmail.com >

I've updated the UMP spec to use a declarative style and moved the
algorithmic specification to a non-normative appendix. Hopefully this
organization will appeal to fans of either style. See:

http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/UMP/

I'm hoping to move UMP forward to FPWD as soon as possible. Please let
me know if there is anything I need to do to expedite this process.

Thanks,
--Tyler




Reply via email to