Hi Art,

On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 1:46 PM, Arthur Barstow <[email protected]> wrote:
> Marcos, All - below is a list of headers for comments submitted to
> public-webapps re  the P&C spec and test suite after CR#2 was published on
> 1-Dec-2009. I think the list is complete but I haven't double-checked it.
>
> Will addressing any of the post-CR#2 comments prevent this spec from
> advancing to Proposed Recommendation:
>
>  http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#cfr

IMO, there is nothing preventing this spec from progressing to PR from
those emails. The emails have only resulted in clarifications to the
spec and fixes in the test suite.

However, I'd personally like to see two "commercial-grade"
implementations (or whatever you would call them, products with
100,000+ users) pass 100% of the test suite before moving this to PR.
I'd hate to see spec bugs showing up in the wild while in PR, when we
could have caught them during the CR phase - or that QA processes from
well-funded  commercial entities discover issues during PR that where
not caught by the smaller scale implementations we currently have (no
offence to anyone that has implemented thus far, I'm just trying to
assure the quality for the benefit of everyone). Anyway that's my
position. If other implementers feel confident that the spec is solid
enough to become a standard, then onwards we go :)




> -Art Barstow
>
>
> = From:  [email protected]
> Subject:        [widgets] Null in P&C
> Date:   February 2, 2010 7:29:42 AM EST
> Archived-At:    <http://www.w3.org/mid/[email protected]>
>
> =       From:     [email protected]
> Subject:        One <feature>, multiple resources
> Date:   January 29, 2010 7:45:18 AM EST
> Archived-At:    <http://www.w3.org/mid/op.u7aodsi2byn...@galactica>
>
> = From: [email protected]
> Subject: [widgets] P&C typo in 9.1.9. Rule for Parsing a Non-negative
> Integer
> Date:   January 19, 2010 7:06:21 AM EST
> Archived-At:
>  <http://www.w3.org/mid/[email protected]>
>
> =       From:     [email protected]
> Subject:        [widgets] Anyone working on SNIFF in Java?
> Date:   December 17, 2009 4:57:21 PM EST
> Archived-At:
>  <http://www.w3.org/mid/[email protected]>
>
> =       From:     [email protected]
> Subject:        [widgets] test-suite: start file encoding
> Date:   December 17, 2009 12:21:42 PM EST
> Archived-At:
>  <http://www.w3.org/mid/[email protected]>
>
> =       From:     [email protected]
> Subject:        [widgets] white space handling
> Date:   December 17, 2009 7:26:24 AM EST
> Archived-At:    <http://www.w3.org/mid/[email protected]>
>
> =       From: [email protected] ; Eyal Sela
> Subject:        Widget packaging conformance
> Date:   December 16, 2009 7:18:37 AM EST
> Archived-At:
>  <http://www.w3.org/mid/[email protected]>
>
> =       From: [email protected]
> Subject:        [widgets] duplicated feature elements ?
> Date:   December 16, 2009 4:51:20 AM EST
> Archived-At:    <http://www.w3.org/mid/[email protected]>
>
> =       From: [email protected]
> Subject:        [widgets] feature: inconsistent behavior ?
> Date:   December 16, 2009 4:13:55 AM EST
> Archived-At:    <http://www.w3.org/mid/[email protected]>
>
> =       From: [email protected]
> Subject:        [widgets] features: default value for required
> Date:   December 16, 2009 3:50:02 AM EST
> Archived-At:    <http://www.w3.org/mid/[email protected]>
>
> =       From: [email protected]
> Subject:        [widgets] test suite: br.wgt
> Date:   December 15, 2009 10:41:31 AM EST
> Archived-At:    <http://www.w3.org/mid/[email protected]>
>
> =       From: [email protected]
> Subject:        Re: [widgets] test suite, the width/height attribute
> Date:   December 14, 2009 10:49:04 AM EST
> Archived-At:
>  <http://www.w3.org/mid/[email protected]>
>
> =       From:     [email protected]
> Subject:        Widget specification - liquid height support
> Date:   December 10, 2009 9:54:15 AM EST
> Archived-At:
>  <http://www.w3.org/mid/[email protected]>
>
> =       From: [email protected]
> Subject:        [widgets] P&C simplifying some rules (editorial)
> Date:   December 9, 2009 7:50:44 AM EST
> Archived-At:    <http://www.w3.org/mid/[email protected]>
>
> =       From: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [widgets] test-cases for icons: some possible errors
> Date:   December 9, 2009 6:34:30 PM EST
> Archived-At:
>  <http://www.w3.org/mid/[email protected]>
>
>
>
>



-- 
Marcos Caceres
http://datadriven.com.au

Reply via email to