On Mar 17, 2010, at 4:22 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
On Sat, 13 Feb 2010, Anton Muhin wrote:
For me performance-wise both approaches seem fine, but to get
numbers I
need to run an experiment.
My main concern would be that rules are overcomplicated imho. And I
won't be surprised if IE and FF would just ignore them. But you
understand all those matters better than I do.
BTW, as the proposed change would reduce stress on GC, I don't
quite see
how this could reduce compatibility (but life is often more
complicated
than I can imagine.)
I've changed the HTML5 spec to allow arbitrary caching for the various
objects in HTML5 instead.
We're probably going to make a change to do caching in WebKit, and we
would still like to see appropriate errata to DOM Level 3 Core. Do we
have anyone who is officially empowered to edit the errata? I can
suggest wording.
Regards,
Maciej
