On Thu, 08 Apr 2010 00:44:07 +0200, Mark S. Miller <erig...@google.com>
wrote:
Since then, both CORS and UMP have changed so that UMP is now a subset
of CORS. Since advocacy of CORS includes agreement with this subset,
absent a third position, UMP is the mutually agreed subset of the two
camps.
If it is a subset though and nobody intends on implementing it it makes no
sense to go forward with it.
Sorry. I meant
From the feedback we've received on UMP, for those issues that CORS
has in common with UMP, it seems clear that the UMP draft's
documentation of these issues is clearer and more readily understood
than the CORS draft.
This is misleading and false:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2010JanMar/0433.html
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
