The draft minutes from the April 15 Widgets voice conference are
available at the following and copied below:
http://www.w3.org/2010/04/15-wam-minutes.html
WG Members - if you have any comments, corrections, etc., please send
them to the public-webapps mail list before April 22 (the next
Widgets voice conference); otherwise these minutes will be considered
Approved.
-Regards, Art Barstow
[1]W3C
[1] http://www.w3.org/
- DRAFT -
Widgets Voice Conference
15 Apr 2010
[2]Agenda
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/
2010AprJun/0124.html
See also: [3]IRC log
[3] http://www.w3.org/2010/04/15-wam-irc
Attendees
Present
Art, Josh, StevenP, Frederick, Frederick_Hirsch, Robin, Arve
Regrets
Marcos, Bryan
Chair
Art
Scribe
Art
Contents
* [4]Topics
1. [5]Review and tweak agenda
2. [6]Announcements
3. [7]View Modes Media Features spec
4. [8]View Modes Interfaces spec
5. [9]AoB
* [10]Summary of Action Items
_________________________________________________________
<scribe> Scribe: Art
<scribe> ScribeNick: ArtB
Review and tweak agenda
AB: the draft agenda was submitted yesterday (
[11]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2010AprJun/01
24.html ). Any requests for changes?
[11] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/
2010AprJun/0124.html
[ None ]
Announcements
AB: I have two; first is that Widget Updates WD was published April
13 ( [12]http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-widgets-updates-20100413/ )
... 2nd is that Digital Signatures for Widgets LC will be published
today; May 6 is deadline for comments
... any other annoucements?
[12] http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-widgets-updates-20100413/
View Modes Media Features spec
AB: Robin has responded to all of the pre-LC comments and updated
the ED accordingly ( [13]http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-vmmf/ ).
As such, I think the spec is ready for LC publication. Any comments?
... proposed RESOLUTION: the group agrees the View Modes Media
Features spec is ready for LC publication
... any comments or objections?
... any voices of support?
... I support this spec moving to LC
[13] http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-vmmf/
RB: I support this
RESOLUTION: the group agrees the View Modes Media Features spec is
ready for LC publication
AB: Marcos told me offline that he support LC of this spec
... re which WGs we should ask to review, are there any groups other
than CSS WG?
... does anyone know about BONDI?
RB: don't know but we can ask
AB: I will include BONDI in the list of review groups
... re the review period length, the minimum is 3 weeks but since
this is the first LC and we want review from others, I think 4 weeks
would be the minimum.
<darobin> +1
SP: this is an HCG area
... should ask them and adjust the time accordingly
AB: I'm OK but don't want it to be too openended
SP: right, so ask them something like "is 4 weeks OK?"
AB: that's OK with me
<Steven> How many pages is it?
AB: is 4 a good number or do we need it longer
RB: I think 4 is fine since it is a smallish spec and CSS WG already
reviewed it once
AB: good points
... I'll use 4 weeks in my proposal to HCG
<Steven> In that case 4 weeks will be fine
RB: it's about 5 pages including all of the boilerplate stuff
<scribe> ACTION: berjon notify Art when the VMMF LC is ready for a
publication request [recorded in
[14]http://www.w3.org/2010/04/15-wam-minutes.html#action01]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-524 - Notify Art when the VMMF LC is ready
for a publication request [on Robin Berjon - due 2010-04-22].
RB: OK, but we need agreement on the short name
AB: good point
... so now it is widgets-vmmf?
RB: right
AB: one option is vmmf, another is view-mode
... I am mostly indifferent
SP: something that is readable is good
AB: how about view-mode?
RB: OK
<darobin> view-modes
RB: use view-modes
... no, make that "view-mode"
AB: any objections to "view-mode"
<timeless> what's the reason for singular?
RB: want singular because media feature in CSS is singular
JS: OK
AB: let's consider that agreed "view-mode"
<scribe> ACTION: barstow submit TransReq for VMMF LC and ask groups
to review it; use "view-mode" as new shortname [recorded in
[15]http://www.w3.org/2010/04/15-wam-minutes.html#action02]
<trackbot> Created ACTION-525 - Submit TransReq for VMMF LC and ask
groups to review it; use "view-mode" as new shortname [on Arthur
Barstow - due 2010-04-22].
View Modes Interfaces spec
AB: earlier this week Anne van Kestern (the Editor of the CSSOM
spec) asked us for "use case example" for the CSSOM spec
([16]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2010AprJun/0
105.html ). Consider this a request for *everyone* to submit use
case examples.
... this is a reasonable request and we should submit use cases as
soon as we can
... one process related issue here is the mail list to use:
www-style, public-webapps or cross-post. I generally don't like
cross-posting but think that's appropriate ATM since currently there
isn't yet agreement on the work split with the CSS WG.
... going forward www-style will be used for CSSOM discussions since
the precedence is already set
... Marcos made a proposal re CSSOM's stlyeMedia.matchMedium usage (
[17]http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2010AprJun/00
71.html ). There has been some follow-up.
... anything today on this?
[16] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/
2010AprJun/0105.html
[17] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/
2010AprJun/0071.html
RB: think we should continue to hash this out on the list
AB: I agree with that
<darobin> +1
AB: we do loose some control if our use cases are addressed by a CSS
WG spec
... but they have the right expertise so I think this is good
... any concerns?
[ No concerns raised ]
AB: this gives us all the continued action to work with AvK and the
CSS WG
... anything else on VM Interfaces for today?
... I don't know if we will have anything left in the VM-I spec
RB: that's good
AB: agree
AoB
AB: anything else for today?
... thanks Robin for following up on the URI scheme disussions
RB: sure; hopefully we can close that soon
AB: next call is April 22; there will not be a call on April 29
... meeting adjourned
Summary of Action Items
[NEW] ACTION: barstow submit TransReq for VMMF LC and ask groups to
review it; use "view-mode" as new shortname [recorded in
[18]http://www.w3.org/2010/04/15-wam-minutes.html#action02]
[NEW] ACTION: berjon notify Art when the VMMF LC is ready for a
publication request [recorded in
[19]http://www.w3.org/2010/04/15-wam-minutes.html#action01]
[End of minutes]
