On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 10:07 PM, Anne van Kesteren <ann...@opera.com>wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 01:27:10 +0900, Tyler Close <tyler.cl...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Why can't it be made exactly like UMP? All of the requirements in UMP >> have been discussed at length and in great detail on this list by some >> highly qualified people. The current UMP spec reflects all of that >> discussion. By your own admission, the CORS spec has not received the >> same level of review for these features. Why hasn't CORS adopted the >> UMP solution? >> > > Because I've yet to receive detailed feedback / proposals on CORS on what > needs changing. How are "Why can't it be made exactly like UMP?" and "Ideally, I'd like UMP to be folded into CORS by reference rather than by value, ..." not a detailed proposal? It's not a long proposal, because the proposal is simple enough to be clear and short. > In another thread Maciej asked you whether you would like to file the > appropriate bugs and the he would do so if you did not get around to it. I > have not seen much since. > > > > -- > Anne van Kesteren > http://annevankesteren.nl/ > > -- Cheers, --MarkM