On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 11:08 AM, Shawn Wilsher <sdwi...@mozilla.com> wrote:
> On 4/23/2010 7:39 AM, Nikunj Mehta wrote: > >> Could we create an additional optional parameter for an open request with >> the type of permanence required? Or is it not a good idea? >> > I haven't talked to anyone at Mozilla that thinks that having permanent and > non-permanent-but-possibly-long-lasting data to be a good idea. There does > seem to be support for a session-only version of indexedDB. > What then do people at Mozilla propose for use cases like flickr/picasa wanting to cache files on the hard disk iff there's plenty of space to do so, but making sure that said caches are not a burden if that users hard disk later fills up? J
