On May 4, 2010, at 14:56 , Marcos Caceres wrote: > right, so it would basically end up looking like: > > widgets/[specname] > > so: > > widgets/packaging/ > widgets/updates/ > widgets/interface/ > widgets/digsig/ > > and so on... for non-widget stuff, I don't know. Maybe we need just a general > "webapps" repo or something.
That WFM. I guess we should just have one webapps repo under which widgets is one directory, no? -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/
