On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Jeremy Orlow <jor...@chromium.org> wrote:
> I agree this is a problem and I largely agree with your solution. My only > concern is performance of cloning data which will (in most cases) not even > be used. I wonder if the result of put should (instead of being the > structured clone + the generated number) simply be the generated key. When > the keys are not auto-generated, it'd be undefined. In the rare case the > person wants to get the rest of the object back, they can subsequently do a > get. Hm, sorry if I was unclear. I think we're in total agreement. The result of put() as currently spec'd for the async API is the key value, not the object+key. I agree that we should keep that, and if the user needs the object+key then they can do a subsequent get(). -Ben
