On 5/20/2010 12:19 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
I additionally like the naming convention. The async interfaces is
probably the interface that people will use first. Additionally that
interface is available both to workers and to the main thread. So it
makes sense to give the async interface the simpler name.
That is not how it is currently specified (and our proposal doesn't indicate either way). The asynchronous versions are not available to worker threads. I do recall discussion on this, however...

Cheers,

Shawn

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Reply via email to