http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9789
Summary: We should use the IDB prefix on all IDB interfaces
Product: WebAppsWG
Version: unspecified
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Indexed Database API
AssignedTo: [email protected]
ReportedBy: [email protected]
QAContact: [email protected]
CC: [email protected], [email protected]
Andrei Popescu proposed a couple naming changes to the interfaces within
IndedexDB deep within the "[IndexDB] Proposal for async API changes" thread
[1].
One of them suggested we consistently use the IDB prefix on all IndexedDB
interfaces. Jeremy, Shawn, and Jonas have concurred.
> - I know we need to keep the "IDB" prefix in order to avoid collisions
> with other APIs. I would therefore think we should keep the IDB prefix
> and make sure all the interfaces start with it (right now they don't).
[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2010AprJun/0801.html
--
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
