On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 3:44 PM, Arun Ranganathan <[email protected]> wrote: > On 6/2/10 3:42 PM, Eric Uhrhane wrote: >> >> Arun: >> >> In the latest version of the spec I see that readAsDataURL, alone >> among the readAs* methods, still takes a File rather than a Blob. Is >> that just an oversight, or is that an intentional restriction? >> > > That's intentional; readAsDataURL was cited as useful only in the context of > File objects. Do you think it makes sense in the context of random Blob > objects? Does it make sense on slice calls on a Blob, for example?
Sure, why not? Why would this be limited to File objects? A File is supposed to refer to an actual file on the local hard drive. A Blob is a big bunch of data that you might want to do something with. There's nothing special about a File when it comes to what you're doing with the data. Just as we moved File.url up to Blob, I think File.readAsDataURL belongs there too.
