On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 6:29 PM, Jonas Sicking <jo...@sicking.cc> wrote:
> Arg, drats, I missed the "planning" part of your email :) > > Sounds good to me, the only thing I would add is that I think we > should remove the base-interfaces, like IDBObjectStore, and copy the > relevant properties to both (async and sync) sub-interfaces. > Agreed. (IIRC, this was mentioned in another thread earlier as well, and no one disagreed then either.) > / Jonas > > On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Jonas Sicking <jo...@sicking.cc> wrote: > > I still see the old "Request" post-fixed names when looking at > > > > http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/IndexedDB/#async-api > > > > Despite the top of the file saying that this is the June 10th version. > > Is there somewhere else I should look? > > > > / Jonas > > > > On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 9:38 AM, Andrei Popescu <andr...@google.com> > wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> A while ago, we discussed some simple renaming of the IndexedDB > >> interfaces. I have already closed > >> > >> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9789 > >> > >> as it was a very simple fix. I would like to recap the rest of the > >> changes I am planning to make, just to make sure that everyone is ok > >> with them: > >> > >> 1. Drop the "Request" prefix from our async interface names and add > >> the "Sync" suffix to the sync interfaces. > >> > >> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9790 > >> > >> 2. Rename IDBIndexedDatabase to IDBFactory. My original proposal was > >> also renaming IDBDatabase to IDBConnection but Jonas had an objection > >> to that. So let's keep it IDBDatabase for now. > Agreed. Closed it as WontFix. > >> > >> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9791 > >> > >> What do you think? > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Andrei > >> > >> > > > >